Hello my name is Brandon Kidwell and we are going to talk about world building for Project Polish’s game being developed for the Masters program called FIEA at UCF!


The process of creating worlds is not an easy task and in most cases it is very daunting. Worlds require a lot of planning and structure that help to drive the creation and future development of the world and everything it touches. There is a big difference between a world developed in a day and the epic that Tolkein left us with. Building the world of the game helps to establish future content and brings it together with a water tight seal that can drive the quality of the game, especially its story. There is no one right way to build a world but there is a lot of solid advice out there. With this in mind I wanted to lay out six rules that I follow when I’m creating a world before I dive into what we have done for our game, Hollow.

  1. Scope of world. How much will you explore? The important fact is that you need to get something on paper. Starting too large will lead to analysis paralysis – the over-analyzing of a situation so much so that no decision or action is ever taken. The world will expand organically so don’t worry about not having everything explained or expanded. Sometimes it is best to let players and others create their own head cannon.
  1. Analysis of other media. Always consume other media like movies, books, anime, etc. More than the consumption, study and analyze the media to see what stands out, what does not. We learn a lot by seeing how other creatives approach the problem.
  1. Associations. Find and use various reference material. Go to a Barnes and Noble and hit up the New Age section or History and start reading! There are a lot of associative material we can use in our world and stories that we recognize through the OSV Cycle (Observe, Speculate, Validate). We love finding the deeper meaning and the references to our world that seem to parallel this fantasy world!
  1. Creation Hierarchy. How did this world come to be? Something created it right? Well even if we don’t know “what” created it we should know that it was created. Establishing this base ideal, however you want to spin it, is crucial. It is a factor that will lead to the development of the entire world. It holds a lot of power and will ultimately be a key component in allowing your world to organically grow. This should also cover how the inhabitants, flora & fauna, landscape was formed.
  1. World History. This should consist of major events in the world. Like with scope choose your battles wisely. Focus on what you are telling in the story or the world and hammer out those major events. If you have structured the world well enough using the above steps then this should write itself as time goes on. Just don’t get stuck with “the possibilities” and get something on paper.
  1. Map. In most cases a map is very helpful but not always required. A map will benefit us by establishing distances, spatial awareness, and associations. It will first lead us to know the regions, then within those regions the settlements and landmarks, etc.



With this we have a better idea of how to build the world from the base up. For Hollow we began to work on the story and general idea of the world prior to beginning the development of the game. Our original inspiration for the story was a song from the anime Erased and an old Italian tale. We initially started with the story we wanted to tell our character and who that character was. This helped establish some moments in the world history that we used later on. Actual development of the world did not start until our first sprint and the core was developed and fleshed out over the two weeks of that sprint… not ideal. With such a small amount of time I instantly scoped out the world establishing that the inhabitants have not been able to explore far from their settlements. This sets up some mystery and allows the rest of the world to be unknown with plenty of room to expand. Due to our story, this world has two realms that parallel each other and since our protagonist moves one from realm to another, the game itself will take place in the latter.

A world will consist of multiple layers, parts, and components that all interact and affect the others. Fleshing these out allows us to continue to build upon them and allow for us to make future content within the world. I began to look into various cultural beliefs and religions including Celtic druids, Buddhism, and Shinto.  I drafted up the first version of the lore for the team and began to iterate with them.

After the first document was created we went into a phase of iteration. The lovely part of working with a team is that we can use each other’s’ experiences and philosophies to question and strengthen the core idea of the world. At this point I would write a document, hand it off to others, gather feedback, and then update the document. Each iteration created more clarity and soon we had a world with inhabitants, society, and history. After two weeks we had a good base, not a full world, but enough to really flesh out the rest of our story and inspire our mechanics/art. The way it was setup allowed us to continue expanding upon it organically, developing concepts as they come to us. The core drives the inspiration and every day a new idea of how to explain something in the world or how component A affects component B came to mind. It is exciting and an awesome feeling to have. In the end the overall experience was rough having little time between all of our projects and homework from the program at FIEA. But I’m proud of where we are and excited to see it go farther!

Last but not least my number 1 tip is… watch anime, especially fantasy and sci-fi series, as most of these have some amazing world history and lore. It is a medium that is not taken as seriously as it should be so I recommend giving a shot!

Avoiding Design Traps in Game Mechanics by Brandon Kidwell

This particular post is my thoughts & opinions on design traps in game Mechanic. 

Mechanic Trap: A mechanic purposefully or accidentally designed to look beneficial to the player but doesn’t provide appropriate benefit.

(this may not be the best description, but it is a starting point).

I have run into this many times in both digital and tabletop games. This commonly appears in RPG games, but is not limited to just that genre. A very brief example would be Dungeons & Dragons 3rd Edition where many feats available to the player actually provide little to no benefit. It can be argued that it is up to the player to make the choice of which feats they are going to take. However the deceptive nature of some of the feats leads us to question if the feat should be in the game at all.

While working on my tabletop RPG, Project Aymir D12, I ran into such an issue. I was designing the abilities for the rogue class and I gave them two reactive abilities. Reactive abilities are literally used as reactions to something and the player can only use so many “reactions” a turn. So, when I created these abilities I looked over both to make sure that the player would want to use them but have to make a skillful decision on which one to use due to their limitation.

Let’s look at the abilities: (these are just quick overviews of the skill and not the final description).

  • (R1)Quick Acting - if the rogue fails to evade an attack he can spend a reaction to attempt a second evasion roll.
  • (R1)Lucky Coin - When the rogue receives damage he may luckily escape the full force of the attack. Flip a coin, if the coin is heads reduce the damage based on your luck score. If tails take the full damage.

The issue here lays within the second ability Lucky Coin. The player gets a 50% chance to reduce damage or take the full damage. You may ask: What is wrong with this?

The skill provides a 50% chance to gain a bonus and costs an important resource. It doesn’t reduce damage to 0 unless the players luck score is really high. On the other hand the player could use Quick Acting and have a chance to negate the damage all together.

This causes “gamist” players or players with some common sense to only chooseQuick Acting as a skill because Lucky Coin is too risky and a trap/waste of experience. If players only choose Quick Acting and based on the games rules it is the most viable option then Lucky Coin doesn’t even need to be in the game.

In that case all we need to do is add some kind of “reason” for people to want to take Lucky Coin. With that in mind I added a second bonus to the player for getting tails on the coin flip.

  • (R1)Lucky Coin - When the rogue receives damage he may luckily escape the full force of the attack or cause the attacker to get hurt as well. Flip a coin, if the coin is heads reduce the damage by your luck score. If tails take the full damage but deal your luck score back as damage.

Now when the player flips the coin he receives a benefit from either side but he takes damage no matter what. This makes it so that players with high evasion may want to retaliate or reduce their damage when actually being hit, so they may take Lucky Coin. Players who do not have a high chance to avoid may choose Quick Acting to give them a second boost in dodging the attacks.


When designing mechanics for anything make sure that there is a reason to choose all mechanics. It is important that the players decisions are skillful choices of their gameplay style. Adding a skill for filler isn’t a valid excuse to put it into the game. It is your job as a designer to piece together the interesting choices players can make.

Color Blindness In Games by Brandon Kidwell

Did you know that majority of games, especially competitive games do not support color blindness? Only recently have game developers begun to incorporate or update their colors in games to help those who are colorblind. I have a few friends that are colorblind so I was made aware of this several years ago. A lot of artists or basically those who choose the colors in the game will commonly go for Red & Green. Both are associated with good/bad, go/stop, etc. An artist is also not color blind, or at least very unlikely so what they see seems fine.

Now, this doesn’t mean your entire game needs to feature colorblindness modes. There are ways of making characters or items pop out without changing your colors. Colorblindness settings come into play when information is vital and the player needs to be able to quickly differentiate two colors. Games such as Call of Duty require quick understanding of player names, if a point in domination is yours or an enemies. In Left4Dead a player needs to see the outline glow of their teammate. Sometimes the enviroment mixes too much red and green making it difficult for someone with Dichromacy or Anomalous Trichromacy to see anything properly.

so, what is the fix for this? Well Yellow/Orange & Blue. My personal preference is Orange and Blue (artistically I like it more) but either works.

Note, I am not covering complete colorblindness because at that point values are the only way to tell the difference between what’s what. I’m only covering Dichromacy and not Anamalous Trichromacy because the earlier is the complete lack of, while the latter is not. If you choose colors based on Dichromacy the Anamalous Trichromacy should be able to see the colors without issue.

Below are the colors in order of the rainbow from left to right. Each example is positioned the same. For those of you that may be color blind and trying to see this The second and fifth circles are Orange and Blue respectively. The third is Yellow.

Dichromacy: Red-Green

Dichromacy: Blue-Yellow 

Here is a comparison of the second and fifth circle from each. Notice that the normal colors translate to different colors.

So remember! Color blind people play your games. About 10% of American males are color blind. A large % of males play games!

Edit: I recently played the Titanfall beta and Respawn chose Orange and Blue as their team colors! Awesome job guys!